Who do you trust to deliver accurate information on the risks of vaccines?
The following individuals are pro-vaccine:
Professor Brian Cox, OBE FRS, physicist
Bill Nye - mechanical engineer and television personality
Neil deGrasse Tyson, PhD - astrophysics, physical cosmology, and television personality
Bill Gates - attended college (did not finish), technology founder, philanthropist and "humanitarian"
Dr. Paul Offit, M.D. immunology, virology. He is the co-inventor of a rota-virus vaccine, now recommended for all infants by the CDC. Does it seem to be a conflict of interest to be such a staunch advocate for vaccines, especially when you are the recipient of income from a widely-used vaccine and pediatrician and director of the first children's hospital that banned the use of dietary supplements to treat health issues?
Do the background of these individuals make them qualified to speak on the safety and efficacy of vaccines? Their strategies typically involve use of fear and biased information to support a pro-vaccine stance. Here's an important question: How much income do these individuals receive for their advocacy work?
More significantly, these individuals fail to uphold Informed Consent, an "overarching ethical principle in the practice of medicine" that is repeatedly violated in medical, health environments and in public service and media messages. Read more from the National Vaccine Information Center.
The following individuals are pro-education regarding vaccine safety and efficacy:
Dr. Suzanne Humphries, M.D., nephrologist (kidney disease)
Dr. Tetyana Obukhanych, PhD, immunologist
Dr. Richard Moskowitz, M.D.,. family practice
Dr. Meryl Nass, M.D., internal medicine
Dr. Susan McCreadie, M.D., Board Certified Pediatrician
Dr. Theresa Deisher, PhD, Molecular and Cellular Physiology
Dr. Robert Rowen, M.D., board certified in family practice and emergency medicine
Dr. Peter Fletcher, PhD, former Chief Scientific Officer at the Department of Health in the UK
These medical and scientific professionals use critical thinking, science and clinical experience to evaluate the impact vaccines have on health. They are the recipients of continual criticism and discrediting by mainstream media and "medical science" due to their willingness to speak out on the dangers posed by vaccines. Many professionals experience a reduction of income when they expose the dangers of vaccines. This doctor tells about his loss of 1.7 million annually in his clinic since making the decision to not require patients to vaccinate .
These medical and scientific professionals are upholding the principle of Informed Consent which says that as a patient (consumer) you have the right to disclosure of the risks of the treatment or procedure. The legal term for failing to obtain Informed Consent prior to receiving a test or procedure on a patient is known as battery (a form of assault).
It is important to note that prior to the advent of vaccines, diseases were on the decline due to improvements in sanitation and nutrition, the advent of electricity, closed sewage systems, and refrigeration. Read more from Whale and the Weston A. Price Foundation.
Prior to the 1980s, pharmaceutical companies faced bankruptcy when they threaten to discontinue manufacture of vaccines. The federal government opted to "bail them out" rather than face the reality of their tainted products, and grant complete immunity from litigation when consumers experienced vaccine-injury. This was the start of something significant; consumers could no longer sue pharmaceutical companies for damage and had to file cases within the provisions and guidelines of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Those who are successful are funded by all taxpayer dollars in the form of a "surcharge" applied to all vaccine costs. Read more from the National Vaccine Information Center.
More information on this topic: