WORKPLACES MANDATING UNAPPROVED ABORTION TAINTED COVID-19 VACCINES

WORKPLACES MANDATING UNAPPROVED ABORTION TAINTED COVID-19 VACCINES

Workplaces have begun the roll-out of mandated vaccines, even before the FDA approval. Could employees request a religious exemption due to the fact that all COVID 19 vaccines were developed, produced and/or tested from aborted fetal cell lines? Is an exemption necessary since it’s illegal to mandate a vaccine prior to FDA approval? What about when the vaccines ARE approved?

IT WAS OBVIOUS VACCINE MANDATES WHY DIDN’T THE LEGISLATURE PROTECT THE CITIZENS?

During the 2021 Session, HFI supported the civil rights bill House Bill 140 MEDICAL CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT – which added to existing law to prohibit discrimination against certain persons on the basis of their vaccination status and to prohibit state contracts with companies that engage in such discrimination. After it overwhelmingly passed the House, Senator Jim Patrick was instructed by Blue Cross of Idaho and IACI to deny the bill a public hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee. The will of the people to secure our liberty and bodily autonomy was crushed by one bought man’s actions.
Senators on the Commerce committee argued and argued for the bill to be brought out and publicly debated. Chairman Patrick refused.
Jim Patrick, the injuries and possible deaths that may occur in the hospital employee population is the blood that will partially be on your hands. You failed Idaho with your cowardice and your love of power and money.

Senator Patrick did not protect our healthcare workers when he had the opportunity.

CALL TO ACTION: SENATOR PATRICK refused to allow a hearing for people’s bill (H140) The Medical Consumer Protection Act because of his connections to Pharma and the insurance industry. The ramifications to people’s livelihoods and healthcare are partially on his hands. Please let him know how the jab requirements will affect you, your family, your health, and your livelihood.
mailto: JPatrick@senate.idaho.gov
Call +12087336897

YES, THE COVID-19 VACCINES UTILIZE ABORTED FETAL MATERIAL.

Coronavirus vaccines developed in the States and globally were made from the cell lines of aborted children — healthy children who were murdered. Most notably, this includes a fetal cell line called HEK-293, from the kidney of a healthy girl aborted in 1972, and PER.C6, from the retina of a healthy boy aborted in 1985.
As a Christian, Can I Take a Vaccine Made from Aborted Babies? This moral dilemma is answered by John Piper founder and teacher of DesiringGod.org and chancellor of Bethlehem College & Seminary.

While the issue of aborted fetal cell line use in vaccine production is now widely discussed, there are few places that document each of these cell lines and the abortions performed to develop them from primary and official sources.

As of 16 May 2020, using mostly primary sources available on the internetNODECEPTION.ORG documented that at least 181 abortions have been performed to develop fetal cell lines for the manufacturing of a variety of our vaccines, including the Covid-19 vaccines currently being used and those in development. Details on all the cell lines are documented here.

SoundChoice.org produced an accurate chart reflecting the COVID vaccines likely to be used in the U.S. that utilized aborted fetal material.

IDAHO STATUTE PROTECTS HEALTHCARE WORKERS FROM DISCRIMINATION.

LEGISLATURE.IDAHO.GOV Section 18-611 FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS

MY JOB IS REQUIRING THE VACCINE! NOW WHAT?

Visit HealthFreedomDefense.org, a plethora of Resources can be found there. Most people don’t understand that the masks that are being used, the tests that are being forced on people, and the vaccines are being forced on people. We knew this was coming.

“What people don’t understand is that every single one of those products was issued under something called an Emergency Use Authorization. It is a Federal Code under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which grants the Secretary of Health and Human Services the authority to grant the EUAs. The EUA statute specifically says, “Individuals to whom the product is administered are informed that the Secretary has authorized the EUA. They must be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of such use and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown. Most importantly, of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
– Interview with Leslie Manookian, Health Freedom Defense

DOES THE SUPREMECY CLAUSE PROVIDE PROTECTION?

It’s Federal Law Title 21 section 360bbb-3. In the constitution is the Supremacy Clause. What the Supremacy Clause means is that no city, state, county, or whatever can implement a law, ordinance, or anything else that conflicts with the Federal Law. The Federal Law preempts local law. We have it right there in black and white that these products, all of them, are issued under Emergency Use Authorization and that we’re required to be informed of the problems with them, known and unknown, and also informed of the right to refuse. What people can do is they can download those forms, whether it’s a mask, a test or the vaccine, and provide the notice.
There are two things on there. There’s an FAQ for the maskstests, and vaccines. There’s a notice to employers for each of those. My law firm is sending those letters to employers.

In other words, are you implying that mandating the vaccine is illegal?
A workplace can’t say, “You must be vaccinated to work here.”
I’m not implying it. We are going to be litigating it.”

Interview with Leslie Manookian

Leslie: “What I’m encouraging people to do is to download those forms, print them, or email them to their employers if they’re being threatened and say, “This is Federal Law and you can’t do this.” Health Freedom Defense is trying to develop a network of lawyers to whom we can refer people who understand the law and can fight on their behalf.”

WT 308 | Health Freedom

About Leslie Manookian

Leslie Manookian established the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF) to ameliorate health injustice through education and advocacy. Health Freedom Defense aids families and individuals whose health rights have been infringed and supports legal challenges to unjust laws that undermine our health and freedoms. Of primary concern to HFDF is challenging a mandatory COVID vaccine.

WITH KNOWN RISKS, SHOULDN’T THERE BE A CHOICE?

Researchers around the world are voicing their concerns about the potential immediate and long-term side-effects of these rushed vaccines, including the possibility of infertility in females.

Everyone needs to be personally responsible for their own health and should research the COVID-19 vaccines in development carefully before making a decision whether or not to vaccinate without coercion by employers.

Individuals who are suffering adverse effects: Vax Long Haulers and www.c19vaxreactions.com
A certain percentage of people – in the thousands – who had the covid vaccine are suffering from debilitating symptoms. Our lives, in many cases, have been ruined with terrifying symptoms, leaving many of us with the inability to work. The widespread general denial – even bullying – of those facing symptoms is making matters worse.
Bitchute channel, and is also on the Rumble channel.

IDAHO HEALTH FREEDOM ACT

There is within Idaho Statute the protection of freedom of choice when it comes to medical decisions.


WHERE ARE THE RESOURCES?

Health Freedom Defense Fund

Leave a Reply