You cannot be Pro-Life and Pro-Vaccine

The pro-life movement and the vaccine safety movement are very closely aligned. It is very rare to find a truly pro-life legislator who supports vaccine mandates. Why? Because aborted babies are used in the development of some of the current and future vaccines. If you are appalled at the law that was passed in NY to allow full term abortion then you should also be appalled that aborted babies are used in the research and manufacturing of vaccines.


Nearly 100 abortions were performed in an effort to find an infected baby with rubella. Vaccine developers lied to the mothers and told them the babies had rubella and would be mentally handicapped so they could gain consent. Seventy abortions later, they finally found one baby with rubella and its cells are currently in every MMR vaccine given.  

You can’t filter those cells out so they are listed as an ingredient in several vaccines.  Dr. Stanley Plotkin was one of the leading researchers in vaccine development. He has admitted in the legal deposition below to using 76 preborn humans older than 3 months gestation as spare parts for vaccine development. 

https://youtu.be/bvBszdGBOxM   < legal disposition.>

Cell lines originating from aborted babies

There are two particular fetal cell lines that have been heavily used in vaccine development. They are named according to the laboratory facilities where they were developed. 

One cell line is known as WI-38, developed at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, PA. 

WI-38 was developed by Dr. Leonard Hayflick in 1962, by taking lung cells from an aborted female baby at approximately the end of the third month of pregnancy. Dr. Hayflick’s article published in the journal Experimental Cell Research states that three cell lines, WI-26, WI-38, WI-44 were all developed from aborted babies. “All embryos were obtained from surgical abortions and were of approximately three months’ gestation.”(1) Dr. Stanley Plotkin, who developed a Rubella vaccine using WI-38, addressed a question at an international conference as to the origin of WI-38. Dr. Plotkin stated:

“This fetus was chosen by Dr. Sven Gard, specifically for this purpose. Both parents are known, and unfortunately for the story, they are married to each other, still alive and well, and living in Stockholm, presumably. The abortion was done because they felt they had too many children. There were no familial diseases in the history of either parent, and no history of cancer specifically in the families.”(2)

The origin of the MCR-5 cell line, created in 1966, was developed for the Medical Research Council in England.

It is documented in the journal Nature by three British researchers working at the National Institute for Medical Research. They wrote, “We have developed another strain of cells, also derived from foetal lung tissue, taken from a 14-week male foetus removed for psychiatric reasons from a 27 year old woman with a genetically normal family history and no sign of neoplastic disease both at abortion and for at least three years afterward.”(3) Noting that their research parallels that of Dr. Hayflick’s development of the WI-38 cell line, the researchers conclude, “Our studies indicate that by presently accepted criteria, MRC-5 cells—in common with WI-38 cells of similar origin—have normal characteristics and so could be used for the same purposes as WI-38 cells.”(4)

In both of these cell lines it is quite clear that the aborted children were presumed to be healthy, and that there was no life-threatening condition or other medically-indicated reason for the abortion of these two babies. They were aborted out of "convenience" and the scientist intent was to use the bodies in vaccine research.

There is a more recent cell line, PER C6 developed in 1985

which is being used currently in research to develop vaccines to treat Ebola and HIV. The origin of PER C6 is clearly documented. In direct testimony before the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, Dr. Alex Van Der Eb, the scientist who developed PER C6, stated:

“So I isolated retina [cells] from a fetus, from a healthy fetus as far as could be seen, of 18 weeks old. There was nothing special in the family history or the pregnancy was completely normal up to the 18 weeks, and it turned out to be a socially indicated abortus, abortus provocatus, and that was simply because the woman wanted to get rid of the fetus.”(5) 

Currently several vaccines using the PER C6 cell line are in development. Undoubtedly the cells used to establish PER C6 came from a healthy baby, aborted from a healthy mother for social convenience reasons. While many of the common childhood vaccines used today were developed using the WI-38 and MRC-5 fetal cell lines, there are some vaccines available that were developed using animal cell lines. 

2015 Aborted Fetal Cell Lines

WALVAX  2 is taken from the lung tissue of a 3 month gestation female who was ultimately selected from among 9 aborted babies.  The scientists noted how they followed specific guidelines to mimic WI-38 and MRC-5 in selecting the aborted babies, ranging from 2-4 months gestation.  They further noted how they induced labor using a “water bag” abortion to shorten the delivery time and prevent the death of the fetus to ensure live intact organs which were immediately sent to the labs for cell preparation.

Those who believe you should not have a choice regarding vaccines say, the cells are no longer in the vaccine, but the chicken pox vaccine was found to have more human fetal DNA than the actual varicella (chicken pox) antigen.

The more we normalize these practices in the name of science, the more it will happen as evidenced by yesterday’s NY passage of their abortion bill allowing the lethal injection of a preborn baby up to the day of birth.  Pharmaceutical companies have a liability free product in vaccines so there is little doubt that they celebrated with those legislators, too. 

Do we know if its safe to inject the residual human male and female DNA numerous time into a developing child? No. 

These practices have never been tested long term for mutagen effects. Human diploid cell produced vaccines are contaminated by exogenous DNA fragments and a retrovirus, and vaccines elicit systemic inflammation and immune activation. Foreign human DNA taken up by human cells will be transported into nuclei and be integrated into host genome, which will cause phenotype change. This can leads to autoimmune problems, cancer and neurological disorders.

Vaccines are not tested for their ability to cause cancer. No reason has ever been given to the public for this, even though it would be very easy to question every cancer patient regarding their vaccine status.

Vaccines that are cultured on this aborted fetal tissue contain the DNA of those babies, and that DNA becomes fragmented in the process of developing the vaccines. 

Theresa Deisher, PhD is President of the non-profit Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute. Her research focuses on the health risks of residual human fetal DNA contaminants and retroviruses found in pharmaceutical products, including some vaccines and how these contaminants may be implicated in autism, autoimmune disease and cancer. 

She explains that we’re not talking about whole double strand DNA, we’re talking about fragments...little bits and pieces of DNA. That DNA, the smaller it is the more likely it is to incorporate into the nucleus of the cells of the vaccine recipient. So those fragments are recombining, they’re inserting into the nucleus of the cells of children who are receiving these vaccines, and insertional mutagenesis is strongly associated with childhood cancers, especially lymphoma and leukemia...both of which have skyrocketed in children as the vaccine schedule has increased drastically. (Listen to Dr. Deisher's interview)

In "The Truth About Stem Cells" interview with The HighWire's Del Bigtree, Dr. Deisher explains how human fetal cell line vaccines are having adverse effects on our children in the form of autism and rare childhood cancers. Dr. Deisher also talks about the arrogance of many MDs and PhDs who don't like to admit that they might be wrong. 

"Child sacrifice and mass experimentation going on right in front of our eyes.”
-Chris Kirckof



Abortion Tainted Vaccines

Vaccines and Religious Exemptions

No, Aborted Fetal Cells were Not filtered out of the Final Vaccine:

part part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsCAUKUTb20

part 2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5b9xsGZs1E

part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UVZSs9vgYQ

part 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M5y9mYQQmt4


Editorials on Vaccine and Religion:

Vaccines: a Religious Contention article on various tenants of faith and their reaction to aborted fetal cell vaccines

Vaccine Risk Awareness article from UK on Catholic faith and aborted fetal cells and vaccines


OPEN LETTER to ALL RELIGIOUS LEADERS in CALIFORNIA  RE: SB277 Government Mandated Vaccines for all children

<printable verison> Printable Copy of the article: Vaccines, Abortion and Fetal Tissue

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT ABORTED FETAL CELL SOURCES:

Taken from the Coriell Cell Repository, a company that actually sells fetal (and other) tissue cell lines, is a complete scientific description of the cell lines and the information on the original abortions:

MRC-5  Aborted Fetal Cell Line   
WI-38 Aborted Fetal Cell Line

More Aborted Fetal Cell Lines Used in Products and Product Testing

PER C6 & HEK-293      
IMR-90 and IMR-91

And there is a plethora of information on many more abortions that were part of polio vaccine research.

Read the document excerpts from the scientists themselves.

Portions of this article came from https://www.facebook.com/1672900919606699/posts/2320104861552965?sfns=st 

Additional Sound Choice Resources: Insertional mutagenesis combined with acquired somatic mutations causes leukemogenesis following gene therapy of SCID-X1 patients.
Howe SJ, Mansour MR, Schwarzwaelder K, Bartholomae C, Hubank M, Kempski H, Brugman MH, Pike-Overzet K, Chatters SJ, de Ridder D, Gilmour KC, Adams S, Thornhill SI, Parsley KL, Staal FJ, Gale RE, Linch DC, Bayford J, Brown L, Quaye M, Kinnon C, Ancliff P, Webb DK, Schmidt M, von Kalle C, Gaspar HB, Thrasher AJ.
J Clin Invest. 2008 Sep;118(9):3143-50.

You just earned points!
Login to save points.
Earn your spot on the leaderboard.

You earned Health Freedom Idaho points!

You're on your way to the top of the leaderboard!